* Further documentation.
* Decided to add an `include` directive. This will have reprecussions directly
for the JLPPegParser, Directive, and LinkAnchor classes. Include needs more
semantic meaning than we currently have in the process because the author
needs some way to understand what is being included. If you include an org
link defined earlier does it include the whole file? Just that doc block? Both
may be the desired behavior in different situations, but I do not want to add
a complex syntax for selecting, just name the link. Therefore there must be
something about the link that determines how much in included. This means we
need more information in LinkAnchor, some link `type` at a minimum. My current
thought is:
* @org defined links--this is the only type of LinkAnchor defined right
now--always bring the whole DocBlock when they are included.
* A new type of link anchor, call them source file links, bring the whole
file when they are included. These types of anchors would be automatically
created by the parser/generator (have not decided where it belongs yet).
The whole SourceFile would need to be included, but we do not want to emit
the normal header for the file so we may have to do somthing about the
initial emit method.
* Additional types of link anchors arise when we add language awareness to
the process. In my current vision we will automatically add link anchors
of different types when we parse code sections (function definition, class
definition, etc.) and the include directive would bring in all the
DocBlocks related to that code node.
* Additional types of link anchors will arise when we implement the @api
directive, we will think about that in the future.
* Updated the JLPPegParser to recognise include directives.
* Added the include directive to Directive.DirectiveTypes
